The projects here are artefacts from an earlier practice built on design’s promise. Rather than being contained “solutions”, they become sites of inquiry where I explore their assumptions, biases, and underlying belief systems.

A.01.
Title: Prism
Description: Museum Application
Year: 2020

Sites of Inquiry:
Institutional access
Commodification of culture
A.02.
Title: Triage 
Description: EMS Systems Study 
Year:  2019

Site of Inquiry:
Informal infrastructures
Care under abandonment
A.03.
Title: L'Urchin
Description: Peppermill
Year: 2018

Sites of Inquiry:
Aesthetic universals 
Class assumptions
A.04.
Title: Chaan
Description: Tea Sieve
Year: 2017

Sites of Inquiry: 
Precarious labour 
Design authority 

These projects share a grammar: the designer identifies, intervenes, improves. They assume clarity is possible, that problems are discrete, and that solutions can be designed without redesigning the conditions that produce the problem. They operate within what I now recognize as design's modernist inheritance—a belief in progress through objects, in legibility through systems, in help as a form of authority.

Through the naturalization of particular political economies and devaluation of other knowledges, “improvement” often becomes a mechanism for reinforcing the logics it claims to soften.